<\/p>\n
H\u00e4r bara n\u00e5gra reflexioner efter plenarm\u00f6tet i g\u00e5r kv\u00e4ll, som en forts\u00e4ttning p\u00e5 det jag skrev i g\u00e5r<\/a>. Det blir f.\u00f6. ett nytt plenarm\u00f6te i dag som \u00e4r senarelagt till kl 15:30 \u00a0svensk tid. Kan vara sp\u00e4nnande att f\u00f6lja!<\/a> Ni som f\u00f6ljde g\u00e5rdagens m\u00f6te \u00a0p\u00e5 webcast och\/eller text captioning m\u00e4rkte s\u00e4kert att<\/p>\n – Det f\u00f6rslag som UAE annonserade, och som kan vara det som l\u00e4cke p\u00e5 wcitleaks.org , presenterades aldrig formellt. Det verkar ha d\u00f6tt…<\/p>\n (UPDATE! Dokumentet lades nyss in formellt f\u00f6r behandling, s\u00e4kert lite \u00e4ndrat och Egypten \u00e4r borttaget, som redan framg\u00e5tt p\u00e5 twitter och l\u00e4ckor! \u00c4nnu ett sk\u00e4l f\u00f6r den intresserade att f\u00f6lja webcast. Togs inte upp i dag, kanske p\u00e5 plenarm\u00f6tet i morgon kl 06:30 (!) svensk tid.)<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong>\u00a0Kanske min f\u00f6rmodan att det l\u00e4ckes avsiktligt som en test var riktig? Egypten tog kraftigt avst\u00e5nd fr\u00e5n det \u201cinte existerade\u201d f\u00f6rslaget och h\u00e4vade att Egypten aldrig st\u00f6ttat det och att det givetvis var fel att man angavs som signat\u00e4r till det. Ett litet klipp fr\u00e5n \u201ctext captioning\u201d, f\u00f6r er som inte var med p\u00e5 webcast: (har r\u00e4ttat n\u00e5gra typos och markerat det v\u00e4sentliga.).<\/p>\n \u201cEGYPT: Would like to clarify its position with regards to the unofficial multi-country draft proposal regarding the review of the ITRs. That was submitted — that was circulated back last Saturday. – \u201cSecurity\u201d forts\u00e4tter att diskuteras, liksom detta med ROA\/OA . Man kom inte fram till ett gemensamt avg\u00f6rande, vilket inte f\u00f6rv\u00e5nar mig.<\/p>\n – M\u00e4nskliga r\u00e4ttigheter, jag spekulerade i min f\u00f6rra blogtext om Sveriges st\u00f6d f\u00f6r m\u00e4nskliga r\u00e4ttigheter, \u00e4ven ang frihet p\u00e5 Internet, skulle sl\u00e5 igenom i det vi g\u00f6r i ITU. Jag visste d\u00e5 inte (skrev det p\u00e5 flyget ner till Dubai) hur det skulle bli. Har inte heller tagit upp det specifikt med v\u00e5r delegation, man \u00e4r ju redan v\u00e4l medveten om Sveriges h\u00e5llning. \u00c4ven om ITU med sitt ITR \u00e4r mer \u201ctekniskt\u201d s\u00e5 har det uppst\u00e5tt ett motiv till att \u00e4nd\u00e5 ha en \u00f6veridande \u201cf\u00f6rtext\u201d till ITR som klarg\u00f6r att man inte i internationell telekommunikation skall f\u00f6rhindra s\u00e5dant som st\u00e5r i strid med m\u00e4nskliga r\u00e4ttigheter enligt FN: \u201cDeclaration of Human Rights\u201d<\/a> som bland annat s\u00e4ger att dessa r\u00e4ttigheter ocks\u00e5 g\u00e4ller p\u00e5 Internet.<\/a><\/p>\n Saxat fr\u00e5n Sveriges inl\u00e4gg i plenarm\u00f6tet i g\u00e5r kv\u00e4ll:<\/p>\n \u201cThank you Mr. Chairman, We welcome the broad consensus reached last Tuesday on not including content in the ITR as well as the strong support from across the room for the freedom of expression and human rights, which you also can see in document 44 \u2013 with support from many of the regions around the world.<\/p>\n The ITR is a technical treaty and should stay that way. The scope of the ITR should not be expanded and internet should not be included.<\/p>\n However we recognize that even a technical treaty may have human rights implications.<\/p>\n We are also concerned that some of the proposals tabled at this conference may have unintended consequences for the member states on human rights obligations. Some of these proposals may be based on a genuine and legitimate concern however Sweden believes that there are other organizations, documents and forums that better deal with these issues.<\/p>\n To highlight the consensus of the importance of human rights we would like to introduce a general reference to the human rights in the ITR preamble emphasizing that member states shall take their human rights obligations into account while implementing these regulations. Det k\u00e4nns bra att vara svensk just nu! Tv\u00e4rr tog man allts\u00e5 inget beslut d\u00e5 det fanns anledning f\u00f6r n\u00e5got land att kontrollera med sin regering, \u00e5tminstone hur textf\u00f6rslaget f\u00f6rh\u00e5ller sig till andra motsvarande internationella \u00f6verenskommelser on m\u00e4nskliga r\u00e4ttigheter man redan avtalat.<\/p>\n Jan Flodin H\u00e4r bara n\u00e5gra reflexioner efter plenarm\u00f6tet i g\u00e5r kv\u00e4ll, som en forts\u00e4ttning p\u00e5 det jag skrev i g\u00e5r. Det blir f.\u00f6. ett nytt plenarm\u00f6te i dag som \u00e4r senarelagt till kl 15:30 \u00a0svensk tid. Kan vara sp\u00e4nnande att f\u00f6lja! … Forts\u00e4tt l\u00e4sa
\nThis document has spread unofficially and we notice that it contains the name of Egypt among its proponents. Egypt would like to reiterate that we never supported this document.<\/strong> We believe that the ITRs are and should continue to be a high level Treaty discussing high level principles. The ITRs must be updated to fit our current times. We hereby confirm that Egypt’s position remains as follows. (Egypt) has always supported and will continue to support the concepts of free Internet<\/strong> and has exerted all efforts to develop the Internet and its widespread among its citizens. Content Regulation and censorship are not within the (scope of?) ITRs<\/strong>. The ITRs shall not prevent States or relevant stakeholders of (agreeing?) (their?) own bylateral or multi-lateral agreement that differ from the ITRs.(Os\u00e4ker p\u00e5 vad det egentligen blev f\u00f6r betydelse av detta, det var en del teckenfel i meningen, d\u00e4r jag har satt parentes med gissning. Jag kan dock ana motivet.<\/strong>) However for parties that are not signatories of the agreement, the ITRs would prevail. The ITRs should not impede multi-stakeholder institutions such as ICANN or ISOC<\/strong> from continuing its functions effectively and should promote the continued vibrancy of the Internet and it’s impact on individuals and the society.
\nThank you.
\n(Applause)\u201d<\/p>\n
\nSweden has come to this conference in the spirit of compromise and is ready to continue engage in constructive negotiations. However there are some areas in which we are not prepared to compromise, the universal human rights is one of them.<\/p>\n
\nFurther more, as you know from other forum, Sweden is supporting openness and transparency and we believe that there is an need to ensure that any debate on these issues \u2013 human rights, internet freedom of expression \u2013 are carried out in an open forum with the public and media present.
\nWe reluctantly go along with your idea to have consultations tonight on some of the issues but any detailed discussions have to be made in public, in order to support transparency and openness.
\nThank you.\u201d<\/p>\n
\nISOC-SE
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"